More States Reject Abstinence-Only Federal Funding; No Change in Fenty Policy
The Associated Press reports that an increasing number of states are rejecting ill-advised Abstinence-Only-Until Marriage funding; and rightly so. There is no scientific evidence that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs—those that censor information about contraception—are effective in preventing HIV or teen pregnancy.
Numerous youth organizations in the District of Columbia have asked Adrian Fenty to also reject these funds, but to date there has been no change in the District of Columbia policy. (I personally asked Adrian Fenty to reject these funds at a Gertrude Stein Democrats Meeting on May 14th, 2007)
The Associated Press reports:
Some $50 million has been budgeted for this year, and financially strapped states might be expected to want their share. But many have doubts that the program does much, if any good, and they're frustrated by chronic uncertainty that it will even be kept in existence. They also have to chip in state money in order to receive the federal grants.
Iowa Gov. Chet Culver, a Democrat, made his decision to leave based on the congressionally mandated curriculum, which teaches "the social, psychological and health gains of abstaining from sexual activity." Instructors must teach that sexual activity outside of marriage is likely to have harmful psychological and physical effects.
A total of twenty two states have rejected these funds. Most recently, New York State rejected the funds. In addition two states, Arizona and Iowa, have announced their intention to forgo their share of the federal grant at the start of the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.
This funding comes with strings attached that are simply unacceptable. The messages required by abstinence-only-until-marriage funding are damaging to gay and lesbian youth. Further, they are Ineffective, Unethical, and Poor Public Health.
I sincerely hope that the District of Columbia will listen to the concerns of the community and reject this funding once and for all.Labels: Adrian Fenty, schools, youth
 The Associated Press reports that an increasing number of states are rejecting ill-advised Abstinence-Only-Until Marriage funding; and rightly so. There is no scientific evidence that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs—those that censor information about contraception—are effective in preventing HIV or teen pregnancy. Numerous youth organizations in the District of Columbia have asked Adrian Fenty to also reject these funds, but to date there has been no change in the District of Columbia policy. (I personally asked Adrian Fenty to reject these funds at a Gertrude Stein Democrats Meeting on May 14th, 2007) The Associated Press reports: Some $50 million has been budgeted for this year, and financially strapped states might be expected to want their share. But many have doubts that the program does much, if any good, and they're frustrated by chronic uncertainty that it will even be kept in existence. They also have to chip in state money in order to receive the federal grants.A total of twenty two states have rejected these funds. Most recently, New York State rejected the funds. In addition two states, Arizona and Iowa, have announced their intention to forgo their share of the federal grant at the start of the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. This funding comes with strings attached that are simply unacceptable. The messages required by abstinence-only-until-marriage funding are damaging to gay and lesbian youth. Further, they are Ineffective, Unethical, and Poor Public Health. I sincerely hope that the District of Columbia will listen to the concerns of the community and reject this funding once and for all. Labels: Adrian Fenty, schools, youth |
Comments on "More States Reject Abstinence-Only Federal Funding; No Change in Fenty Policy"
post a comment